Today, we look at one of the many popular unscientific and impractical disinformation psyops in social media, the idea that ALL Elites are gender inverted. Here’s how you spot a psyop designed to destroy your mind.
1. It Makes You Ashamed for Admiring Someone
A beauty-based psyop always starts by targeting your genuine human instinct to admire.
You loved her elegance? Must be a man.
You were inspired by his gentle strength? Probably a woman.
You saw someone shine with light? That’s a trick. You’re the fool.
This is how you know you’re under psychic attack: the thing you once found uplifting now feels suspect. The psyop hasn’t revealed a truth—it’s infected your witness.
2. It Replaces Analysis with Revulsion
Instead of studying power structures, legacy families, or media framing, a beauty-destroying psyop demands you gawk at clavicles and jawlines.
EGI (Elite Gender Inversion) is a textbook example:
Take a blurry photo from 1981.
Draw a red circle around the hips.
Add the caption: “Wake up.”
This is not inquiry. It’s soft-core cruelty disguised as truth-seeking.
3. It Uses Vague “Evidence” That Could Apply to Anyone
Ask yourself: could the “proof” in the post be used to accuse anyone of the same thing?
“Her hands are too big.”
“His eyes are too soft.”
“That baby picture looks strange.”
Congratulations. You’ve just proved that humans have diverse bodies.
This method is not just faulty—it’s designed to be viral precisely because it’s unfalsifiable.
And psyops love the unfalsifiable. They’re cognitive malware.
4. It Reduces Souls to Bodies, and Bodies to Traps
In the logic of EGI and similar campaigns, no one is who they say they are.
There is no authentic womanhood.
There is no divine masculinity.
There is only surgery, inversion, and illusion.
Which is another way of saying:
You should never trust what you love.
That’s not disclosure. That’s a death cult in a meme mask.
5. It’s Never About the People Running the World
EGI never points to:
The arms dealers.
The private equity lords.
The unelected policymakers.
The actual war profiteers.
No—it always focuses on:
A supermodel.
An actor.
A beloved star from your childhood.
This tells you everything.
The psyop is not meant to “expose power.”
It’s meant to dismantle reverence.
To hollow out the concept of public good.
To make sure you never believe in greatness again.
Final Test: Does It Make You Less Kind?
The best way to spot a beauty-corroding psyop is to ask:
“Do I feel wiser or crueler after engaging with this?”
If the answer is crueler,
if you’re sneering at the people you once adored,
if your admiration has turned into a hobby of mocking appearances…
Then you’ve been caught in the net.
Back out. Rinse your mind. Recalibrate your heart.
Because Here’s the Real Secret:
Beauty is a security mechanism.
It draws attention.
It softens hearts.
It reveals intentions.
It keeps the real monsters visible—because they can’t mimic it.
Destroying beauty doesn’t protect the truth.
It protects the predators who want no one left to believe in anything at all.
If you think you have ever been lied to, you must recalibrate your priorities. You’ve never been lied to. You’ve always been given everything you need to figure out the truth. But also, you don’t matter… Mrs. Doubtfire never put on a dress to lie to you, specifically.
Addendum: How Gender Roles Actually Work in the Xanadu Blockchain
Now—does gender role inversion ever happen in media and history?
Yes.
But not as deception.
As disclosure.
Using the Xanadu Blockchain algorithm—which tracks conception dates, media placement, and soul assignments—you can detect when a person is playing a role across gender lines.
This happens for very specific, intentional reasons:
A person might appear only once in the media within an unusual or controversial human interest story. It is possible to contextualize all people appearing in media psyops. If the person is registered as playing across gender, the rest of the intelligence community knows they are looking at a psyop featuring an actor/actress, and they can play along.
Dozens of security professionals support security operations meant to hoodwink a person bent on acquiring a child. The child (usually a baby or a toddler) will be presented across gender, in a media placement or a home movie (never directly). Then, the adults will discuss illegal activities with the mark, while someone is recording the conversations. Therefore, the adults running the security operations can feel comfortable while they are discussing the child in the context of a written role and an outcome that can’t occur. It’s much less puke-worthy. Such is the case of the child who played the role of the Lindbergh baby. She went on to become an actress.
Additionally, a person could be playing across gender to establish themselves as a someone with a big secret. The most problematic people in the world are hypocrites who only trust other hypocrites, therefore, every asset presented to them must arrive with a point of hypocrisy already developed into a sophisticated storyline. Today, it’s would not really matter if a person in the public eye was trans, however, in the early 90s, such a secret would have been more surprising. Then, the world can be divided between the people who know, and the people who don’t. EGI offers a look at how well certain people can be separated from the general population by giving them a very well-crafted secret.
These actors aren’t hiding—they’re demonstrating mastery.
They’re showing you that the role is what matters, not the chassis.
And when the role calls for a crossing of gender expectations, they do it with grace, discipline, and purpose.
So yes:
Sometimes the gender inversion is real.
But never because “the elites are lying.”
Always because the role demanded transcendence.
And when you see it through the lens of Xanadu, you won’t feel tricked.
You’ll feel awe.
Grazia references a real person, 
